MomsMakingaMillion Radio Interview: Community Investing

Kat Bellucci:Last week on the show, Paul brought up the topic of socially responsible investing.  He explained that it was the sort of investing that follows our beliefs.  In other words, these are investments that invest in businesses that are focused on the same core values we try to live by: protecting the planet and the world our children will inherit.  While Gina and I had numerous questions about the subject, the one topic that hit closest to home was the idea of community investments.  Could you explain a little more about what this is?

Paul Petillo: We all know, in the business world access to money, more specifically access to credit, is key to success.  Credit as we all know is a good faith agreement between you and a lender that whatever you borrow money for will be put to good use and will be paid back in the agreed upon time.
Unfortunately, this agreement is not offered to low-income individuals or communities.  Lack of access to credit, equity, capital or basic banking services often keeps the poorer part of our population poorer.  We often think of this as a global problem but it is very much a concern right here in the US.

Community investing makes it possible for local organizations to provide financial services to low-income individuals, and to supply capital for small businesses and vital community services, such as childcare, affordable housing, and healthcare.

Paul: That’s true.  Just like you say in the intro to the show, raising women’s wealth or in this case, access to the opportunity to increase their financial standing will go a long way to eliminating poverty.

Kat: Why don’t banks and large financial institutions do something about this? 

Paul: More than just the low profit margins that often come as a result of this type of investing, many larger institutions simply do not want to take the risk.  This is where Community Investment Institutions or CIIs step in giving priority to people who have been denied access to capital and provide them with opportunities to borrow, save, and invest in their own communities.  These folks are often creditworthy, hard working individuals but lack the assets required to secure any type of big bank agreement.

Kat: So what can we do?

Paul: First we need to understand how these types of investments work.  Many of these investments work like mutual funds. But they do not invest in stocks; they invest like bonds.  A bond is basically a loan that provides you with a yield or interest payment in return for your invested dollar.  With CIIs, the returns are usually lower than the markets offer but the satisfaction return is much higher.

For instance, Access Capital Strategies, a fund run out of Boston by David F. Sand focuses his bond fund on financing for low- and moderate-income homebuyers, the development of affordable rental housing units, Small Business Administration loans, and economic development projects in urban and rural communities across the U.S. In some cases, you can actually use the fund to target a specific geographic area.

Kat: Are there opportunities for investors who don’t want to use a fund?

Paul: Absolutely. They need only find a community development bank or credit union that makes an effort at strengthening lower-income communities.  This is often done by these institutions provide when they provide everything from checking and savings accounts, to CDs and IRAs, to mortgages and other loans focused on customers who may be turned away from larger banks and lenders.  Women like Lisa Thompson working at the Louisville Kentucky Community Development Bank uses her resources to make loans focused on revitalizing poverty riddled neighborhoods.  To date, she has made over $49 million in loans to her community creating over 1300 jobs in the process.

Back in 1974, the National Federation of Community Development Credit Unions was begun to help credit unions help their communities. They do this in a variety of ways.  Not only do the promote programs to match the savings of low-income folks looking to by their first home, they offer education, grants and help fight predatory lending in these neighborhoods.  Payday type loans often are the scourge of low-income wage earners who are met with unexpected financial needs.  CDCUs go a long way in helping educate and bridge the gap between poverty and financial security.

Kat:You mentioned that these opportunities are not just here in the states but worldwide.

Paul: I have provided a link to all of these types of loan funds and banks on your blog.  You can pick and choose from a variety of countries from Peru to Cambodia, from Mexico to Mongolia.  Almost anywhere really.  This might not be the best way to fund your retirement but it is certainly an excellent way to make money and feel good about your investment at the same time.  As I mentioned earlier, there is a high satisfaction return.

Resources: 

Is it Socially Responsible to Outperform? Absolutely!

Back in October of 2009, I re-profiled socially responsible mutual funds.  They are not available to me in my 401(k) so frequent monitoring of these important investments are not usually are my investment radar.  That is unfortunate, because they should.

As it turns out, investing in socially responsible funds would have done the investor a world of good while doing the world some good.  We all know now that actively managed mutual funds outperformed the S&P 500 index in 2009.  While critics suggest that this is cyclical – and they may be right on some counts – the fact that 65% of these SRI funds who focus on businesses doing the “right thing” not only for their shareholders but the world in which these shareholders live, took much of the investment world by surprise.

Consider the chart below, which is, it should go without saying, is not an endorsement or a suggestion to invest and spans the last year ending December 31, 2009.

U.S. Large Cap
Benchmark: S&P 500                                          26.46%
SRI fund performance                                         32.67%

U.S. Mid Cap
Benchmark: S&P 400 Mid Cap                            37.38%
SRI fund performance                                          36.24%

U.S. Small Cap
Benchmark: Russell 2000                                      27.17%
SRI fund performance                                            32.37%

U.S. Balanced
Benchmark: Blend 60% S&P 500, 40% Barclays
Capital U.S. Aggregate                                            18.40%
SRI fund performance                                             20.54%

U.S. Fixed Income Bonds
Benchmark: Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate        5.93%
SRI fund performance                                             8.04%

International Equity ­ EAFE
Benchmark: MSCI ­ EAFE                                        32.46%
SRI fund performance                                             28.11%

International Equity ­ Global
Benchmark: MSCI ­ World                                       30.79%
SRI fund performance                                            35.03%

Lisa Woll, CEO, Social Investment Forum believes that a growing number of investors a lashing back against what they consider to be companies who show no consideration for the investor.  She suggested as much in a January 21st press release : “In the wake of the financial crisis more and more consumers are concerned about runaway executive pay practices and other forms of corporate misconduct and sustainability risks.” This sort of investor sentiment is something that has been growing steadily, the beneficiaries of this sort of thinking are the businesses who care.

The SIF analysizes 22 fund families among which are some well-known names and some not so mainstram: Access Capital Strategies; AHA; Appleseed; Ariel; Azzad; Calvert; Community Capital Management; Domini; Gabelli; Green Century; Integrity; Legg Mason; Meeder Asset Management; MMA Praxis; Neuberger Berman; New Alternatives; Parnassus; Pax World; Portfolio 21; Sentinel; Walden; and Winslow.

The number of funds professing a socially responsible investment style are small in number by comparison to the overall group.  The SIF tracks only 73 funds with this investment focus.  Yet three out of four did better that the world’s most popular index.  As Cheryl Smith, chairman of the board at the Social Investment Forum said in the same press release: “This analysis underscores the reality that socially responsible investments offer what are genuinely competitive returns”.

It would however be worth your time to explore these funds.  Many are growing in popularity (in large part because of performance numbers like those posted above) and because they have competitive nature of the fund industry, their fees are coming down as well.  For a comprehensive list of the funds available in this group, click here.

The Socially Responsible Retirement Choice

You have changed all of the light bulbs in your house, disconnected all of the energy draining electronic cords and insulated your abode in an effort to not only conserve. But to go green. Have your investments taken a similar path? Are your efforts at finding a mutual fund that ascribes to your values proving difficult? Perhaps it is time to look at socially responsible mutual funds.

While these types of funds have been around for decades, the attractiveness of them has been thwarted by some extra considerations that most investors don’t feel is worth the cost. And there are costs.

But first, let’s discuss what these funds are and what they are try to do for the investor. Mutual fund managers do not have an easy time finding the companies they need to create an efficient (tax-wise and fee-wise) portfolio of stocks and securities. The reasons are simple: not that many companies comply with the strict definition of what a socially responsible mutual fund is.

One of the attributes is Corporate governance and ethics. While most companies say they act ethically and govern their shareholder’s investment with care, far too many fall short. Add to that the issue of how they treat their workers, the quality of the products they produce, which can lead to yet more concerns about the environmental and how what they do impacts the community around them.

A great many businesses have made strides in all of these issues but progress is slow and sometimes scattershot. More difficulties arise when these companies deal with people and workers living overseas. Not only is the politics of the country in which these employees might work be at issue but so is how the indigenous people are being treated.

These qualifiers leave the choices dramatically whittled down. Some funds take the list even further, culling out those companies that don’t share moral or religious beliefs. But socially responsible investors are on the right track and through their efforts over the years, many disclosures about how proxy votes (those done by your fund manager with your permission) are cast. Also evidence of this movement has forced many major corporations to begin to “clean-up their acts”.

These are all pluses. What about the minuses? Many of the funds who invest in this way use the KLD400 index as a guide, much like the Standard & Poors company provides for index funds less focused on these concerns. That index, according their site looks for “Companies involved beyond specific thresholds in alcohol, tobacco, firearms, gambling, nuclear power and military weapons are not eligible for the KLD400. Companies that do not meet KLD’s financial screens (market capitalization, earnings, liquidity, stock price and debt to equity ratio) are also ineligible for inclusion.”

The company tracks numerous other sectors, indexing sustainable companies from the total market down to small caps, Catholic to Select Social Indexes. The cost for research for these funds, even when using the index as a guide tends to be higher than for other actively managed or indexed funds. That would be a minus.

Yet, closer examination of these indexes finds that what usually haunted potential investors, overall return has improved dramatically, in many cases, beating comparable indexes published by S&P or the FTSE (an independent company jointly owned by The Financial Times and the London Stock Exchange).

If you approach these investments in the same way you do other investments, with an eye on cost, performance, tenure of the fund manager and low overall turnover in the portfolio, you will get good results from your flight to value. In fact, you will find many of the indexes listed below actually did better than their less-researched, less sector constrained counterparts.

Socially Responsible funds are sector funds in the purest sense of the word but in many instances lack the volatility of other sector funds. And considering the values these underlying companies are trying to achieve, some on their own, others at the behest and urging of the communities in which they operate, this movement isn’t leaving any time soon. And that should have a positive effect on returns and ultimately, as demand grows, the fees.

Returns on the the following indexes and comparable indexes are as of 09.30.09 for a one year period (which includes one of the more devastating years for the stock market):

U.S.
FTSE KLD 400 Social Index (KLD400) -3.69%
S&P 500 -6.91%
FTSE KLD Catholic Values 400 Index (CV400) -3.55%
FTSE All World USA -6.44%
FTSE KLD US All Cap Sustainability Index (USSA) -6.04%
FTSE US All Cap -6.30%
FTSE KLD US Large Cap Sustainability Index (USSL) -6.81%
FTSE US Large Cap -7.31%
FTSE KLD US Mid Cap Sustainability Index (USSM) -1.14%
FTSE US Mid Cap -3.49%
FTSE KLD US Small Cap Sustainability Index (USSS) -6.92%
FTSE US Small Cap -5.53%
FTSE KLD US Large-Mid Cap Sustainability Index (USSLM) -6.65%
FTSE US 500 -6.57%
FTSE KLD US Small-Mid Cap Sustainability Index (USSSM) -3.29%
FTSE US Mid Cap -3.49%
FTSE KLD Select Social Index (SSI) -6.65%
FTSE US 500 -6.57%

Additional info for you, the greening investor, can be found here.

Paul Petillo is the Managing Editor of BlueCollarDollar.com