Mutual Funds, Bonds, Interest Rates and Bubbles

Almost every investor in the country owns a bond. This ownership might be via bond mutual funds, investments in individual bonds be it corporate, government or municipal, or through the widely used target date funds. Each is prone to its own troubles.

Bond mutual funds, even though they are managed by expert managers, may be so burdened by the underlying investments as to hide or mask the trouble that may be brewing in this market.

Individual bonds are influenced by the health of a company, the ability of the government to retain its high credit rating or in the case of the municipality, pay off the debt it is owed to those who invested.

Target date funds, the darling of the auto-enrolled 401(k) participant may contain the most trouble in part because you don’t have a good bead on what is owned and in many cases, in what proportion.

There are some essential elements of a bond that many simply do not grasp to its fullest. Not the least of which is the effect that interest rates have on these investments. In short, bonds are loans and the way these borrowers pay you back is with the agreed upon interest. Many bond issuers simply refinance those bonds to pay that interest. But what if the interest rate isn’t favorable to such financial restructuring?

So let’s talk interest rates for a moment and some of the assumed beliefs you may have.

The trickle up effect

We often put a good deal of the emphasis on the Federal Reserve bank and their presumed control over all interest rates. They lend to the largest banks in what is called an overnight rate. Banks increase that rate to consumers at each level of lending, the last rung being the consumer loan for a mortgage or a personal loan.

Those rates are determined by demand, the market forces at play and in many instances, inflation and/or governmental budgetary needs (deficits). The Fed looks at money supply, the other half of the demand equation and depending on how much is circulating – too much and the interest rates remain low, too little and they increase. Sometimes.

Sometimes fear increases those rates as well. Growth forecasts and a strengthening economy normally lead to more demand for capital which leads to higher interest rates. Add to that the increasing possibility that inflation will rise as well. gives everyone who borrows the jitters. They know, should these things happen, the Fed will raise interest rates in the name of stabilizing the economy.

The emerging market conundrum

The world is global – while an oxymoron as a stand alone phrase, it represents a growth not previously seen in the decades prior to this one. Emerging economies are building at a pace that is much faster than anyone anticipated. Much of this growth is coming from China but there are numerous other economies doing the same thing on a slightly smaller scale.

The flip side of that growth is investment and investment needs money and countries, faced with growing populations who no longer worry about saving, instead shifting to spending, force borrowing. This will increase interest rates – probably sooner than we expect. many of us have experienced low interest rates for so long, we consider it to be the norm.

Consumers: should you save or should you spend?

The most common answer is to spend. Popular economic theory is that if consumers fail to spend, the economy will languish. This is actually not the whole truth. If interest rates are low, it would pay for infrastructure improvements much more cheaply than otherwise – and these improvements are necessary if corporations expect to become more efficient in their production of goods and services.

The bottom line, a healthy savings rate actually adds to the improvements that need to be made. It doesn’t suggest that folks won’t spend. But it does prompt companies – at least in theory to do a better job enticing you to do so.

Is mortgage deductibility important?

Possibly but the impact is lower and more specific than many suggest. Lower interest rates on home loans entice borrowers to buy more house than they need, refinance to increase their debt and those actions pour more money into the economy. Yet at the same time, estimates of lost revenue to the federal government have been estimated to be as high as $104 billion a year.

Raise those interest rates

No doubt, we expect interest rates to remain low. But they should be inching up. According to Richard Dobbs, director in McKinsey’s Seoul office and a director of the McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) and Susan Lund is director of research at MGI, higher interest rates would “also limit financial bubbles, restraining speculative and heavily leveraged investment while encouraging more investment that would actually raise the economy’s potential growth rate, such as expanding the country’s broadband network, developing new green technologies, and rebuilding aging infrastructure.”

The authors of that report also suggest, a rightly so, that “higher rates would also focus executives’ attention on the return that companies earn on their capital, prodding them to make sure they get more bang for each buck. This could boost the nation’s productivity, which is the key to raising standards of living over time.”

Does this point to a bond bubble?

Not necessarily so. What it does however is seduce investors into thinking that all is well and bonds do not come with risks. Gus Sauter, chief investment officer of The Vanguard Group, the largest U.S. bond mutual fund manager with $413.6 billion of fixed income assets as of Dec. 31 wrote that he is “increasingly worried that people aren’t aware of the risks in the bond market. The problem is that when you’re at historically low rates, as we are now … yields aren’t likely to go significantly lower, and at some point when the economy does strengthen, they’re likely to push higher.”

This does suggest that bond investors are overbought, denying the risks involved and ignoring the potential, even probable readjustment in this corner of the market. Will it burst as a bubble might? Not likely but the slow hiss will take the least experienced investors by surprise and it may be too late by the time it happens for them to do much of anything.

With one exception, possibly two. Increase your equity exposure is one. The other, buy short maturities. This last one might make it difficult for individual bond holders to ladder their portfolios. But at least you won’t be stuck with bonds that are worth less in an inflationary period.

The Overwhelming Temptation of Bonds: Investing in Bonds in 2011

In a way, describing all other investments – stocks, mutual funds, ETFs and commodities – seems easy. But when it comes to bonds, the telling of the tale of fixed income is so nuanced that one opinion usually cancels another. Politics is an unavoidable player in the discussion. Because bond holders stand in the who-owes-what-to-whom line first and the belief that this corner of the investment market is somehow safe or better safer, the topic is muddied by how bonds actually work, what influences them and the role they play in the economy. Debt, it seems, is still a problem.

Long after you may have balanced your individual balance sheets, the specter of debt still lingers as one of the real problems facing the economic recovery. But what is this debt? First you have to explain what bonds are. In short, bonds represent the ability to borrow from the investment public, offer a guarantee of payment and a certain amount of interest for the loan. Because bonds prices move in the opposite direction of yield (the higher the price for a bond, the lower the rate paid to investors; the lower the price of the bond, the higher the rate owed and promised) they reflect economic attitudes.

To buy a bond, you must first believe that whoever is issuing the debt is capable of repaying the debt. The lower the likelihood of repayment, also known as default, the higher the risk and consequently, the higher the cost of repaying by the issuer. In short, to make more money from the investment, you must be willing to take the risk that the debt you are buying might not pay you in full. This risk is not only displayed as a high yield price but is portrayed in the debt’s rating.

Then there are the wide varieties of reasons that create this situation. In a bad economy, such as the one we are still struggling to escape from, the flight to safety by investors drives the price of bonds up as the yield falls. In a bad economy, the threats to this thinking are many and include how the Federal Reserve reacts to the situation, the prediction of inflation over the duration of the debt and who eventually defaults.

If the Fed doesn’t react or promise help in the form of short-term loans – which is really all they can offer a state or municipality and those debts need to have a duration of six months or less and only 2% of those types of bonds do – the risk of owning the debt can rise. If inflation, which the Fed watches closely rises, the return on those yields is lessened. If defaults become likely over a sector fo the bond market and the Fed does nothing and inflation rises, the issuer is unable to create new debt to pay old by rolling it over and is forced to simply default on the debt, leaving the bondholders to pick through the remains of what is owed.

Told you it wouldn’t be simple. And 2011 looks to be even more complicated. Debt is usually issued by three different entities: the Treasury, corporations and local states and municipalities. The Treasury sells bonds or debt to primary dealers. Then, the Fed turns around and prints money to buy that debt from those primary dealers leaving them with a nice margin for the effort. This roundabout financing is not much more than a shuffle of numbers and in the end, everyone is happy. Why? Because banks cannot run out of money so the cycle feeds on itself.

Some say that this is aberration of market discipline, a longstanding belief that prices for products set themselves. When the Fed intervenes with freshly printed dollars, buying assets that may or may not be worth the price paid – and lately its been the later – the illusion that everything is okay even as those purchases are held or otherwise resold for pennies on the dollar, can in some expert’s opinion do more harm than good.

To give you some idea what the Fed is actually capable of there is a mission statement written by the Federal Reserve System under the heading  ”Purposes and Functions” which defines its duties as falling into four basic categories: “conducting the nation’s monetary policy by influencing the monetary and credit conditions in the economy in pursuit of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates; supervising and regulating banking institutions to ensure the safety and soundness of the nation’s banking and financial system and to protect the credit rights of consumers; maintaining the stability of the financial system and containing systemic risk that may arise in financial markets; providing financial services to depository institutions, the U.S. government, and foreign official institutions, including playing a major role in operating the nation’s payments system”

In part of one of our two part series (the next will be on corporate debt) the interaction between the federal government’s ability to help the states and municipalities deal with what is surfacing as the next debt bubble for the economy is a very real concern among investors who pay attention to these events. You probably haven’t given this much consideration considering the vast majority of investors who own these types of bonds do so with them safely tucked inside their target date funds. Some have straightforward bond funds.

Should you worry about these investments? Yes and no. I don’t think that despite the problems that states and municipalities are having with their debt, Ben Bernanke is going to allow for any sort of mass default. Instead of coming right out and purchasing these trouble debt instruments, which only Congress can authorize and is not likely to do, he will use the backdoor approach of Printing money to buy these assets from Wall Street. The local governments get to stay solvent, the banks make money on the transfer and the debt is eventually offloaded with only pennies on the dollar spent for the effort. And yes, because if that doesn’t happen, the losses could mount up quickly and viciously.

Conservative investments are not what they used to be – but then little is. The illusion of safety in fixed income might come back to bite more investors this year than many of us would anticipate. And those with maturing target date funds will feel the brunt of those problems twice: first in lost returns in their funds and second in the increased taxes they will pay in the places they live. (Best suggestion: push the target date back a couple of decades to take advantage of a robust stock market and lower exposure to fixed income investments in those funds.)

As I mentioned earlier, we’ll talk about corporate bonds next and the odd relationship they have with the stock market.

Municipal Bonds Have Risk

We want to believe it simply isn’t so. Municipal bonds or munis, those hometown or home state, often tax exempt debt instruments which are favored among the retired, the soon-to-be retired or those looking for a conservative but well-paid return may be facing a little headwind. But truth be told, you should have noticed.

When you buy a municipal bond, you are essentially buying a project believed to be worthwhile for the city, county or state issuing the debt. They are rated in much the same way as a corporate bond is with a single exception worth noting. If a municipality issues a bond and has difficulty paying the coupon, they often simply raise the local tax rate to cover the shortfall. But like all sorts of funding, the increased tax revenue that would pay for the bond payment shortfall is also in short supply.

This means trouble for what was once the set-it-and-forget investment. Although not all bonds issues by these locales are in trouble. Many of the projects that are vital to city and county services, such as water and sewer projects are considered among the safest. As one city planner recently suggested, folks will pay for their water and sewer bill increases even though they might complain.

But some bonds issued are dependent on public support for their success and their repayment of the debt. If that new stadium fails to attract the projected number of ticket buyers, trouble could be looming for the bondholder. There is only so much fans are willing to pay for seats and hotdogs. If the cost of a light rail system cannot be offset by attracting businesses along its routes, the city is not likely to raise taxes to help support a poorly planned project.

What is likely to happen is a missed payment. Just like your own personal accountability when you miss a credit payment, the cost of your debt increases. For municipal bonds, the rating might fall which prompts the municipality to offer ever higher rates to attract new investors for new projects. It also make it difficult to sell a bond like this before it matures.

Folks who can ride out the bond until maturity will not lose their money – at least we can assume this is the case. But if you believe this is possible, the research is up to you. Many business news sources do not report on municipal bonds. But local news sources do and investors should take an active interest in what is happening locally, particularly if they have a financial stake in the project.

If they do uncover the potential for a problem, be it current or in the future, the best thing you can do is sell the bond at a loss. This is more difficult if you are invested in a mutual fund that holds a wide variety of bonds. Of course you can sell the bond mutual fund if you suspect there is trouble on the horizon. But your fund manager should be well aware of these problems before they become yours – which is why you may have invested in a mutual fund in the first place.

The real question is how much risk is in these bonds? It might be more than you suspect. Rising interest rates could stall the economy somewhat and make tax revenue projects fall short. This could increase the number of defaults on these bonds. According to Mitchell Savader, CEO of Savader Asset Advisors, a municipal bond–research firm in New York City “there might be 100 more defaults in 2010, out of some 60,000 bonds currently active”.

That’s a small but still worrisome number. But not one that is beyond your control. Do some of your own legwork on local investment projects. And do some reevaluation of your own financial standing in the process. If you believe you can wait it out until the bond matures (in other words you invested with money you did not need), then holding it would be the best option. But selling at a loss if you feel the risk has become out-sized for your conservative portfolio, waiting might only make it worse.

To see and hear more about these bonds.