There is no such thing as plan B. The idea of such a thing is based on the belief that at some point, we will need something to fall back on should the original plan not work. But if you stop to think about it, plan B is not a back-up plan as most if us assume it is; it is another Plan A. When it comes to retirement, Plan A does not have a back-up.
Working longer, as many have begun to lament is not a plan B, but a whole new plan that relies on increased contribution, more focused investment goals, a new standard for budgeting with a dash of hope thrown in the event our health doesn’t hold out. Plan Only is a retirement plan that simply has a lot of what-if contingencies.
So I thought I’d take a minute or two and discuss some of those contingencies and why they don’t deserve to be in any plan but the one you have. Let’s use the often used metaphor of a road trip. As we plan our summer vacation, this might be how we get to where we are going, so this visual might be apt for our discussion.
In a retirement plan, you invest what you think will give you the necessary fuel to get you to a place you never have been. It is a journey you cannot possibly anticipate fully; yet we will try. The plan for such a trip, be it to grandma’s house cross country or retirement, cross decades, the essential needs are always considered, often first.
The car should be in good repair and ready to make the trip without obvious incident. The vast majority of us can’t predict all of the problems a complicated piece of machinery might have, and we could worry ourselves silly trying. But we can make the obvious inspections: tires, brakes, belts, oil and gas.
Our retirement plan should have a similar walk-around. If you are making a healthy contribution, the plan offers a decent variety of funds to pick from and doesn’t charge you too much for the privilege, and you are doing what you can to find even more to put in it by reeling in some of your personal expenses, then you have more or less done what you could. Almost.
But most us are nagged by the idea that we could have done more, could have created some alternative plan that would automatically get jump started the moment the plan we had failed. Do you expect a new car to show up roadside when something major happens mechanically on that road trip? We had just such a breakdown in 2008. The first notion was not to replace the retirement plan you had, but repair it. Plan B isn’t a reparation of the first plan; it is designed to be a whole new plan, not a quick fix.
So what should plan only look like? Just like on the car, you need to appreciate the nuances of the vehicle. Same with your retirement plan. Neither was designed to be driven forward without some sort of care and maintenance. For a car it might be an oil change. For your retirement plan, it might be funds. You should be looking towards diversity (which means investments spread across numerous areas) and the easiest way to do this is with index funds. Ironically, not all 401(k) plans have index funds. If yours doesn’t, ask HR why.
No one would think they could complete a 500 mile plus journey without a stop for gas. We’ll cringe at the cost of a fill-up but do it nonetheless. Yet when we need to fuel our 401(k) with increased contributions, we do not. Instead, we often keep the tank on mere fumes making innumerable excuses for how that money could be better used. To keep with our analogy: imagine looking for a gas station every 100 miles. It becomes annoying to stop so often. Your 401(k) will not get you where you are headed unless you keep the tank full.
You can anticipate delays, such as road construction, and add supplies to help you get past these set-backs. If you invest regularly, do so using index funds and contribute more than you think you can afford, market roadblocks are reduced to bumps, not catastrophes.
Plan Only will always get you where you need to go. If it doesn’t work, you will take what elements of it did and reformulate a new plan only. But you only can juggle one plan at a time. Trying to build two distinct plans is waste of energy, effort that could have be used making plan only better and more failure proof.