Planning for Failure: Retirement is Plan Only

There is no such thing as plan B. The idea of such a thing is based on the belief that at some point, we will need something to fall back on should the original plan not work. But if you stop to think about it, plan B is not a back-up plan as most if us assume it is; it is another Plan A. When it comes to retirement, Plan A does not have a back-up.

Working longer, as many have begun to lament is not a plan B, but a whole new plan that relies on increased contribution, more focused investment goals, a new standard for budgeting with a dash of hope thrown in the event our health doesn’t hold out. Plan Only is a retirement plan that simply has a lot of what-if contingencies.

So I thought I’d take a minute or two and discuss some of those contingencies and why they don’t deserve to be in any plan but the one you have. Let’s use the often used metaphor of a road trip. As we plan our summer vacation, this might be how we get to where we are going, so this visual might be apt for our discussion.

In a retirement plan, you invest what you think will give you the necessary fuel to get you to a place you never have been. It is a journey you cannot possibly anticipate fully; yet we will try. The plan for such a trip, be it to grandma’s house cross country or retirement, cross decades, the essential needs are always considered, often first.

The car should be in good repair and ready to make the trip without obvious incident. The vast majority of us can’t predict all of the problems a complicated piece of machinery might have, and we could worry ourselves silly trying. But we can make the obvious inspections: tires, brakes, belts, oil and gas.

Our retirement plan should have a similar walk-around. If you are making a healthy contribution, the plan offers a decent variety of funds to pick from and doesn’t charge you too much for the privilege, and you are doing what you can to find even more to put in it by reeling in some of your personal expenses, then you have more or less done what you could. Almost.

But most us are nagged by the idea that we could have done more, could have created some alternative plan that would automatically get jump started the moment the plan we had failed. Do you expect a new car to show up roadside when something major happens mechanically on that road trip? We had just such a breakdown in 2008. The first notion was not to replace the retirement plan you had, but repair it. Plan B isn’t a reparation of the first plan; it is designed to be a whole new plan, not a quick fix.

So what should plan only look like? Just like on the car, you need to appreciate the nuances of the vehicle. Same with your retirement plan. Neither was designed to be driven forward without some sort of care and maintenance. For a car it might be an oil change. For your retirement plan, it might be funds. You should be looking towards diversity (which means investments spread across numerous areas) and the easiest way to do this is with index funds. Ironically, not all 401(k) plans have index funds. If yours doesn’t, ask HR why.

No one would think they could complete a 500 mile plus journey without a stop for gas. We’ll cringe at the cost of a fill-up but do it nonetheless. Yet when we need to fuel our 401(k) with increased contributions, we do not. Instead, we often keep the tank on mere fumes making innumerable excuses for how that money could be better used. To keep with our analogy: imagine looking for a gas station every 100 miles. It becomes annoying to stop so often. Your 401(k) will not get you where you are headed unless you keep the tank full.

You can anticipate delays, such as road construction, and add supplies to help you get past these set-backs. If you invest regularly, do so using index funds and contribute more than you think you can afford, market roadblocks are reduced to bumps, not catastrophes.

Plan Only will always get you where you need to go. If it doesn’t work, you will take what elements of it did and reformulate a new plan only. But you only can juggle one plan at a time. Trying to build two distinct plans is waste of energy, effort that could have be used making plan only better and more failure proof.

When it comes to Retirement Planning and Investing, are Women different than Men?

Last week on MomsMakingaMillion Radio, I spoke about some of the differences between women investors and their male counterparts. I suggested that when these two groups were surveyed, the focus was more about finding a way to get more women investing than it was helping women invest.

In the business of investing, brokerage houses and the like are always looking for new clients. It is what they do. And even though women have grown as an investor group, men still outnumber women in terms of who invests and who doesn’t. The difference between these two groups is startling which is why these investment firms want to understand how to tap this largely unexploited market.

What make women different investors than men?
Let’s begin with the experience they receive in childhood. A vast majority of women do not get much in the way of personal finance instruction at home. They may get some money management tips and they might get some advice about where to put money or even how to spend it wisely. But this is different than personal finance.

Personal finance is a whole life approach to money. Most advice these women receive coming up through their childhood focuses on saving money, not investing it and saving money on purchases, not whether there was an actual need for the purchase. Think about this when it comes to your daughters. Do they save money to spend money and when they do, feel good about it when they get a bargain?

While effect, this sort of approach teaches our daughters how to be smart shoppers, how to budget and possibly how to run a household. And in the process, pigeon-holes them into the role of who does the shopping and who does the investing if they should ever get married or simply share their financial lives with someone. This may not happen all of the time and I’m not suggesting it is right, but in the vast majority of instances, these roles seem to fall naturally in to place. Once this assignment of financial jobs within the household takes place, it becomes difficult to explore what the other partner is doing without seeming like you are stepping on toes.

Most of these studies have found that when women look for financial advice, they go to someone they can trust and in too many instances, the someone they trust isn’t even qualified to handle their own finances let alone dole out advice. Trust isn’t often experience in this instance.

Are women unprepared to approach investing?
Dune Thorne, managing director at Silver Bridge Advisors, an independent wealth manager in Boston discovered this when she attended Harvard Business School. There were plenty of classes to teach students how to handle millions of dollars of other people’s money but nothing on personal finance. And even more troubling, when it came to those classes on investment management, there were far fewer women enrolled.

Women rely on personal relationships – and I have suggested numerous times throughout the years I have been writing about this topic – that we should all find a financial mentor, not for advice so much as someone you can bounce ideas off, someone to hear you talk out loud about a financial idea. But these folks may not be experts. Men seek experts but don’t often listen to differing points of view. Women do.

That’s a big difference. It’s not that women want something different than men, although they do. The bottom line is they want the same products but for different reasons. And they take a different approach to getting them.

Ms. Thorne also found that women like to learn in groups, such as this radio show where a wide swath of women get together and discuss topics that are of interest to them. Men like the one-on-one approach of getting advice.

Key differences
Women approach investing with much longer-range goals and with a much wider orientation on how to use their money. Women think about investing with their children in mind and even how they can be more charitable or philanthropic. Men tend to think more about not outliving their money and invest to that end. Women seek legacy. Men seek more immediate goals.

This is a huge difference in how women and men think about money and the path they take to get there will be different.

There are steps we can take now to change this from occurring.
Teach your daughters well. Spending and saving (when you do) is often the focus of personal finance for young girls. In part because you have been given control over the daily budgets for groceries and household needs. If you, as a mom are removed from the financial obligations of the house, if your husband or the man in your life has that job, how can you possibly teach your daughters and sons how the whole household works? This meaning that the whole household approach involves investing for the future as well as financing the present.

Educate yourself. In many instances, this is not as hard as it seems but be careful to avoid some of the pitfalls I mentioned earlier. Get with a group of like-minded moms, take a class or simply read the experts on the subject.

And lastly, identify your goals. If you are like most women, you have them but haven’t really thought about what it would take to achieve them.

I’m not suggesting this should be done at the exclusion of your spouses of partners. In fact, it would be better if it were done with them. But knowing the language of investing, the nuances of what it is, the feelings you have as you approach the future are not always easy to express if you are new at it. Once you possess these skills, you will be able to parse any and all information that you share with greater understanding of not only who you are but where you would like to eventually be.