Your 401(k): Keeping Up with the Jones’

We’ve bought houses we couldn’t afford and then filled them with toys – that we also couldn’t afford. Now it is being suggested that we want what the Jones’ have in their portfolio as well. This is being suggested as the exact opposite of how you should construct your 401(k) portfolio. But perhaps not.

Peer pressure, even the indirect kind has been cited in numerous studies as something of less desirable trait. Often called herd mentality, the reaction is genetically embedded in all of us and with good reason. If you lingered as the herd ran away, chances are the outcome wouldn’t favor a long life. So when the herd runs, you tend to run with them. Contrarians rarely survived.

And so it goes with just about everything we have done in the milleniums that have since passed. It is a reaction that has spilled over into our financial lives and is most often associated with the selling of a stock when the market begin to tumble or in reverse, buying when equities are clearly over priced. We’ve done it before and chances are we will do it again.  The most recent exhibit of this blind dedication to what the “herd” has suggested was in housing. And it is there that we find the most outward signs of this follow-the-crowd mechanism.

Yet, it was recently determined that you do much of the same with your 401(k). I had once quipped in an article that what desktop trading enabled was the liars in all of us. No longer would we have to face anything but the raw numbers of our poor or otherwise mistaken trading decisions staring back at us from our screens. For the rest of the world, it was the story we told – one that couldn’t be verified.

But turn that around and we love to talk. Perhaps it might be bragging in some circles but few identify it as such. In fact, we become envious which usually leads to curiosity and you guessed it, the willingness to follow a path that someone has already successfully trailed. Keep in mind that once a trail has been discovered, you will not the next to travel it. In fact, by the time the news of this reaches you, it’ll be too late. But what if the success comes via a person 401(k)?

Vanguard discovered in a study conducted for four years during the pre-2007/2008 stock market run-up and shortly there after that we listen to what Mr. Jones in the next cubicle tells us about where his retirement is. Why? Because if Mr. Jones is doing well, he will tell you. And it seems you pick up on the reverse signals as well: when Mr. Jones isn’t successfully investing, he is much less likely to tell you about it.

You are also more likely to readjust your portfolio in light of those opinions. If equities have done well for Mr. Jones, you are more likely to re-allocate your portfolio in an attempt to mimic his success. Turns out you will do the same in the opposite direction. This shouldn’t come as much of a surprise considering that you probably joined the 401(k) because your co-worker has.

The question is: is this a good thing? Joining a 401(k) is definitely high on the list of good things you can do for yourself. Match or no match, the pre-tax abilities of this plan to add wealth in retirement cannot be debated. The quality of the plan and how allocate the assets however can be discussed. As well as the plan construct itself.

The discussion of how well you co-workers have allocated their assets however should be considered. No two financial plans are the same and neither are the risks any two are willing to take. Individualizing your plan to suit your tolerances based on what your co-worker has done is not as easy as it sounds. Herd mentality has proven to be profitable only for those who tend to be at the beginning of the herd’s movement. But we will follow nonetheless, even if the results (successes) are diminished by our late entry.

One way to avoid this is to utilize the index funds available in your 401(k). Investing over a wide spectrum of indexed possibilities (large-cap, mid-cap, small-cap, international and emerging markets) is still the best way to increase wealth while avoiding out-sized risks. And because your co-worker is more likely to pinpoint some successes, they normally remain quite about their not-so-wise choices that may offset their total returns.

Olivia Mitchell, director of the Boettner Center for Pensions and Retirement Research at the University of Pennsylvania suggested recently that: “When participants in 401(k) plans make pension investment decisions, they tend to be influenced by what their co-workers are doing, rather than being directed simply by the principles of risk diversification and related concepts.” While Mr. Jones may have convinced you to get into your 401(k), his choices should not necessarily be yours.

Notes on Investing: Baruch and Lessons Learned, Part two

In part one of this review on one of the greatest investors, Bernard Baruch, titled “Notes on Investing: Baruch and Lessons Learned“, we looked at what he has learned from his own mistakes, errors that we all make and of which numerous books have been written in an attempt to correct our own investor and totally human fallibilities on the subject.

 

  • Someone once suggested that worrying is like a rocking chair – it’s something to do but doesn’t get you anywhere. But worrying about things you have control over – rather than those you don’t, consumes many investors as they attempt to gain some rest at the end of the day. Baruch believed that there is a “sleeping point” that investors, or the savviest ones, understand and if you have failed to reach this point, where you can simply lay your head down and get the rest you need, you should do as Baruch suggests and sell to that point.
  • Investing as a hobby is not investing. It is more dabbling. You are willing to lose money even as you think you can make some. Real investors embrace what they do as a full time task. Baruch suggested: “Because of the extreme challenge, one must commit full attention to it” to which he also added about those who do it part time or do so in a speculative manner, investing is “no different than trying to be a successful doctor or lawyer….you simply must devote yourself full time to the study of your craft.”
  • We are social animals by nature and because of that need to interact, be it in person or through the numerous online and offline media outlets, we look for opinions. Or better, we look for reassurance. Or even better than that, we look for something that we can glean, some tidbit that no one else has yet to uncover or capitalize on. Baruch boiled it down to one simple tenet and suggested that anyone doing any investing at all do so by “doing one’s own thinking”.
  • Someone once suggested that men invest and tend to dominate the investment world because they love the bravado of doing so. Brauch suggest taking that bravado out of the equation. In other words, no matter your gender, boasting is not what you should do – ever. He believed it was “best to trade alone.” Doing so from your home office or a laptop in a coffee shop is not what he had in mind when he coined this directive. Instead, it was a suggestion to research, analyze, and purchase with confidence. He wrote: “Most of the successful people I’ve known are the ones who do more listening than talking.”
  • This is pretty simple and also the focus of many books and reports: how does the economy impact what you do and how you should invest. Baruch believed that the markets were basically mirrors of the economic health, not movers. No reflection has ever taken a commanding role in where the one making the reflection needs to be. This skill is not as easily mastered as it is learned, through trial and error, time and nuance.
  • Baruch did what many average investors do not – and possibly should not. He traded both long and short. I didn’t say he bought on margin, borrowing someone else’s money to make trades. He understood the way the markets worked and embraced the flexibility of how the markets could be traded.
  • Simply stated: “there is no investment which does not involve some risk and is not something of a gamble.” Although numerous authors have suggested you can take the gamble out of the effort, in truth, it can’t be done. Instead Baruch offered that “what we can try to do perhaps is to come to a better understanding of how to reduce the element of risk in whatever we undertake.”
  • And most notably, diversification spreads an investor thin, making the person monitor too many fronts. Baruch thought it was “better to have a few stocks and to watch them carefully.”
  • Few of us structure our portfolio with cash on the sidelines. Baruch considered this an important facet of the process suggesting that a “good supply of cash on hand at all times in reserve is important”. Crashes happen, markets fall and opportunities happen and without cash on the sidelines, you will miss those opportunities.

Tomorrow, in part three of our look at the investor Bernard Baruch, we will look at his belief that seeking perfection in this one effort is really what you are looking for.

Boomers Take Note: A Coordinated Effort is Key

I wanted to take moment to address Baby Boomers, both early and late. Now this doesn’t preclude those who fall into the various other generational groups that have emerged on the scene since that term was coined. In fact, those among you that are young(er) could benefit even more by the following retirement planning suggestion than Boomers could. But it is all about the timing.

There are two things which continue to pop up in missives such as these. Diversification is always key and should always be part of the subtle and not-so-subtle conversations about investments. Although only a few of us actually achieve this, it is still worth the effort. Why do you ask is this simple sounding process, one described as not investing all your eggs in one basket so hard to accomplish?

Diversification is often too easy to explain away, either by the successes you may have achieved while ignoring it or simply by complacency. In other words, you know better but have an excuse why you fail to do anything about it.

Suppose for example you purchased the stock in your company’s 401(k) plan because, it was perhaps inexpensive to do so (lower than open market transaction costs might be a reason) or because it is the only match the plan offers to something like I-really-believe-in-the-business you work for also believing it will always be great and therefore, worth investing in).

All good reasons to buy the company. Yet we often buy so much that if something did happen and something always does, we create an imbalance in a plan that is meant to last a lifetime. You know better and often only acknowledge the fact after it is too late to do anything. Diversification could be as important as being the eleventh commandment.

The downside consequence of failing to diversify and be reversed in a number of different ways. You could educate yourself about what the plan offers and in doing so, do what you had been promising yourself you would do for a long time. You will find out that if your company is among the top 500, you probably own additional exposure in an index fund, in a large cap equity fund, perhaps in a target date fund and even some exposure in a fixed income fund as well. Combine all of those together and you can no longer claim to be diversified. If you ever could make the claim.

You have a wide variety of funds in a 401(k). Most offer about 20 options and even if those plans are costly (many 401(k)s have boasted that they have found funds with lower expenses and then turned around and raised your administrative costs), they are what you have to work with. So spread out you exposure to one stock across all of those funds. If you have more than 20% of your 401(k) in one stock, you have too much. And there are more than a few of you who have over 70% invested.

Now I mentioned this was directed towards Boomers and I also mentioned there were two things. The other is asset allocation. Diversification and asset allocation are not one in the same yet are close enough to be inseparable. Often, looking to achieve one, you will help fix the other.

Asset allocation suggest that because you can choose from so many different types of investments (stock, bonds, funds that offer both, commodities, and perhaps other investment options as well) you should be taking steps to minimize the risk you may have taken in your youth so as to protect what those risks have rewarded you with. Because there is only so much money to go around, moving from a big exposure in stocks to something more conservative, such as a fixed income investment, could help solve the diversification issue.

Not always though. I’d be willing to wager that if you do begin, perhaps as part of this suggestion to realign your assets, you will probably sell your investment in the company store last. And by doing so, you increase your exposure to one investment and by default, actually decrease your diversification – or what little you had. If you must, put a number that you are trying to get that outsized investment in your company’s stock down to and sell it to get there. Perhaps 20% would be as good a goal as none.

Now back to the Boomers. You have two opportunities to help you with both your asset allocation and your diversification issue, if you have any. And it is all about the timing. Coming up in April 1st, those who are 70 1/2 need to begin taking distributions. The first wave of baby boomers officially retired this year as well. If you haven’t changed your asset allocation or diversified your investment significantly to protect yourself, choosing which money to begin spending can help.

If you begin disbursements this year, sell off the stock side of your portfolio first. This keeps any failure on your part from becoming bigger as time goes on. The longer you hold on to equities, the longer your risk stays high.

Now some of you close to retirement can achieve somewhat the same effect by investing any tax return (or bonus) into a fixed income fund. You have until April 18th to do this; later if you are filing an extension.

You can also begin to redirect how your money is invested in your 401(k) as well. Less going to stock and more towards protecting what you have earned is always sage advice but few of us actually sell one thing to move into something more conservative. Particularly if there is a nice run on the stock market occurring at the time. Waiting until a bear market simply means you waited too long. Target date funds are attempting this but have yet to prove that they can achieve this.

There is only so much money to go into your retirement account and if you are maxing it out, congratulations. But if you aren’t increasing your contribution levels can help you achieve both asset allocation and diversification, simply by choosing something new that fits the concept.