Mutual Funds, Bonds, Interest Rates and Bubbles

Almost every investor in the country owns a bond. This ownership might be via bond mutual funds, investments in individual bonds be it corporate, government or municipal, or through the widely used target date funds. Each is prone to its own troubles.

Bond mutual funds, even though they are managed by expert managers, may be so burdened by the underlying investments as to hide or mask the trouble that may be brewing in this market.

Individual bonds are influenced by the health of a company, the ability of the government to retain its high credit rating or in the case of the municipality, pay off the debt it is owed to those who invested.

Target date funds, the darling of the auto-enrolled 401(k) participant may contain the most trouble in part because you don’t have a good bead on what is owned and in many cases, in what proportion.

There are some essential elements of a bond that many simply do not grasp to its fullest. Not the least of which is the effect that interest rates have on these investments. In short, bonds are loans and the way these borrowers pay you back is with the agreed upon interest. Many bond issuers simply refinance those bonds to pay that interest. But what if the interest rate isn’t favorable to such financial restructuring?

So let’s talk interest rates for a moment and some of the assumed beliefs you may have.

The trickle up effect

We often put a good deal of the emphasis on the Federal Reserve bank and their presumed control over all interest rates. They lend to the largest banks in what is called an overnight rate. Banks increase that rate to consumers at each level of lending, the last rung being the consumer loan for a mortgage or a personal loan.

Those rates are determined by demand, the market forces at play and in many instances, inflation and/or governmental budgetary needs (deficits). The Fed looks at money supply, the other half of the demand equation and depending on how much is circulating – too much and the interest rates remain low, too little and they increase. Sometimes.

Sometimes fear increases those rates as well. Growth forecasts and a strengthening economy normally lead to more demand for capital which leads to higher interest rates. Add to that the increasing possibility that inflation will rise as well. gives everyone who borrows the jitters. They know, should these things happen, the Fed will raise interest rates in the name of stabilizing the economy.

The emerging market conundrum

The world is global – while an oxymoron as a stand alone phrase, it represents a growth not previously seen in the decades prior to this one. Emerging economies are building at a pace that is much faster than anyone anticipated. Much of this growth is coming from China but there are numerous other economies doing the same thing on a slightly smaller scale.

The flip side of that growth is investment and investment needs money and countries, faced with growing populations who no longer worry about saving, instead shifting to spending, force borrowing. This will increase interest rates – probably sooner than we expect. many of us have experienced low interest rates for so long, we consider it to be the norm.

Consumers: should you save or should you spend?

The most common answer is to spend. Popular economic theory is that if consumers fail to spend, the economy will languish. This is actually not the whole truth. If interest rates are low, it would pay for infrastructure improvements much more cheaply than otherwise – and these improvements are necessary if corporations expect to become more efficient in their production of goods and services.

The bottom line, a healthy savings rate actually adds to the improvements that need to be made. It doesn’t suggest that folks won’t spend. But it does prompt companies – at least in theory to do a better job enticing you to do so.

Is mortgage deductibility important?

Possibly but the impact is lower and more specific than many suggest. Lower interest rates on home loans entice borrowers to buy more house than they need, refinance to increase their debt and those actions pour more money into the economy. Yet at the same time, estimates of lost revenue to the federal government have been estimated to be as high as $104 billion a year.

Raise those interest rates

No doubt, we expect interest rates to remain low. But they should be inching up. According to Richard Dobbs, director in McKinsey’s Seoul office and a director of the McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) and Susan Lund is director of research at MGI, higher interest rates would “also limit financial bubbles, restraining speculative and heavily leveraged investment while encouraging more investment that would actually raise the economy’s potential growth rate, such as expanding the country’s broadband network, developing new green technologies, and rebuilding aging infrastructure.”

The authors of that report also suggest, a rightly so, that “higher rates would also focus executives’ attention on the return that companies earn on their capital, prodding them to make sure they get more bang for each buck. This could boost the nation’s productivity, which is the key to raising standards of living over time.”

Does this point to a bond bubble?

Not necessarily so. What it does however is seduce investors into thinking that all is well and bonds do not come with risks. Gus Sauter, chief investment officer of The Vanguard Group, the largest U.S. bond mutual fund manager with $413.6 billion of fixed income assets as of Dec. 31 wrote that he is “increasingly worried that people aren’t aware of the risks in the bond market. The problem is that when you’re at historically low rates, as we are now … yields aren’t likely to go significantly lower, and at some point when the economy does strengthen, they’re likely to push higher.”

This does suggest that bond investors are overbought, denying the risks involved and ignoring the potential, even probable readjustment in this corner of the market. Will it burst as a bubble might? Not likely but the slow hiss will take the least experienced investors by surprise and it may be too late by the time it happens for them to do much of anything.

With one exception, possibly two. Increase your equity exposure is one. The other, buy short maturities. This last one might make it difficult for individual bond holders to ladder their portfolios. But at least you won’t be stuck with bonds that are worth less in an inflationary period.

The Overwhelming Temptation of Bonds: Flight from Safety

Years ago, when I wrote my first book (Building Wealth in a Paycheck-to-Paycheck World, McGraw-Hill, 2004) I introduced readers to the Professor. A grizzled old man fond of dirty jokes in uncomfortable settings, he exemplified what bond investors were or at least what I thought they were. This was group who focused on minute changes in price and yields in order to position the money they had in the safest position possible with the greatest chance of yield.

We talked about laddering – a process of buying bonds at different maturity dates, something individual investors may not have the savvy or acumen to achieve. We talked about the economy and saving and living on what money he had amassed and what his pension provided. He had no family to speak of and I didn’t know his name until he died. But he was, and until the last several years, the face of the bond investor.

Bond investors do come in all shapes and sizes, ages and disciplines. Some buy bonds and don’t even know while others actively seek what this market offers. And as we know from the previous post about this sort of fixed income investment, they can also be volatile and risky despite their staid exterior. Bonds are loans and debt has been in trouble over the last several years. What seemed like a sure thing is now swirling with rumored problems about defaults – what happens when the bond issuer cannot make their obligation to the bondholder.

During the last month of 2010, bond holders had to come face-to-face with the very real possibility that some bonds might not be able to make interest payments and in some cases, rolling the debt over to newer, more attractive debt tools. In the world of bond issuance, there is always the possibility that you can borrow money cheaply in the future, pay-off older debts of the past, satisfy those who lent you the money and move on as if nothing happened. But what if the money is more expensive in the future and you will have to offer higher interest rates – considering the current rates you pay may already be unsustainable – and your debt is coming due? You think default.

And if everyone you know owns a bond – you’d be surprised at the age some people find bond investing worth investigating, perhaps even owning – feels panicked by the possibility that there might be a bubble in this market, a sell-off, like the one in December is to be expected. But here is a couple of reasons why there won’t be a bubble like readjustment in the bond market and some insight on what bondholders could have done instead.

Two things are not going to change: the population will continue to age and target date funds will continue to find new investors. The first baby boomer reached 65 on January 1 and if that groups is in a position to retire, they will. The money they will retire with will need a safe place to hide from potential losses and bonds will remain the place of choice. Unfortunately, it will not be the best place over the long-term, with yields still lower than projected inflation rates in the same period.

Target date funds are not going away anytime soon as they continue to be the default investment for numerous plan participants introduced to their 401(k) for the first time. These funds became the darlings of the skittish investor, the one who simply couldn’t trust their ability to make the right financial choice, in part because of the losses they may have dealt with as the economy and markets soured. Target date funds invest in bonds as the targeted date gets closer. In theory, a target date fund that is geared towards a retirement date of 2020 will hold many more conservative investment (bonds) than a fund with a 2050 target.

A huge influx of investors to target date types of investments, a souring market place and an aging population all added to a bond buying spree. This pushed prices up and yields down. But when the perception that something is wrong, such as the threat from Europe that some sovereign nations might not be able to make their bond payments due to shortfalls in available cash, trickles into the worrisome brains of bond investors here at home, prices go down and yields go up. In the world of bonds, this is not what you want if you are looking to refinance your debt.

But I promised a look at corporate bond investing, a wholly different sort of market that may be affected by interest rates to some degree and might be impacted by tax rates should the expire. What separates corporatie debt from sovereign or municipal debt is the ability of the company to assure the investor that they can perform in the marketplace well enough that their investment will be repaid. In the world of the corporate bond, it is the bondholder who stands in line first should the company run into problems.

Those problems or the potential for problems determines the risk. The greater the optimism that the economy is improving coupled with companies that have balance sheets projecting long-term optimism, the lower the interest in chasing higher yields elsewhere such as overseas or in emerging markets. Those yields, which have been dropping – compared as the spread between what Treasuries offer and what business issues, can, on the surface at least, suggest that there will be an exodus creating the bubble bursting analogy.

Not likely according to some analysts who see some readjustment but certainly not a burst.  What it does mean is that refinancing will be much easier for businesses to accomplish in the coming years. It does mean the bondholders will be left with lower yields, but along with that, fewer chances of default.

Bonds are not going anywhere. Boomers are aging as I mentioned. Target date funds continue to be popular among the investor who simply doesn’t have the time to learn the alternatives. And folks are still distrustful of the equity markets. The one thing bond fund managers are warning about is going too long-term. Keep it short they suggest because in the world of bonds, worry rules. And they are still somewhat worried.

The Overwhelming Temptation of Bonds: Investing in Bonds in 2011

In a way, describing all other investments – stocks, mutual funds, ETFs and commodities – seems easy. But when it comes to bonds, the telling of the tale of fixed income is so nuanced that one opinion usually cancels another. Politics is an unavoidable player in the discussion. Because bond holders stand in the who-owes-what-to-whom line first and the belief that this corner of the investment market is somehow safe or better safer, the topic is muddied by how bonds actually work, what influences them and the role they play in the economy. Debt, it seems, is still a problem.

Long after you may have balanced your individual balance sheets, the specter of debt still lingers as one of the real problems facing the economic recovery. But what is this debt? First you have to explain what bonds are. In short, bonds represent the ability to borrow from the investment public, offer a guarantee of payment and a certain amount of interest for the loan. Because bonds prices move in the opposite direction of yield (the higher the price for a bond, the lower the rate paid to investors; the lower the price of the bond, the higher the rate owed and promised) they reflect economic attitudes.

To buy a bond, you must first believe that whoever is issuing the debt is capable of repaying the debt. The lower the likelihood of repayment, also known as default, the higher the risk and consequently, the higher the cost of repaying by the issuer. In short, to make more money from the investment, you must be willing to take the risk that the debt you are buying might not pay you in full. This risk is not only displayed as a high yield price but is portrayed in the debt’s rating.

Then there are the wide varieties of reasons that create this situation. In a bad economy, such as the one we are still struggling to escape from, the flight to safety by investors drives the price of bonds up as the yield falls. In a bad economy, the threats to this thinking are many and include how the Federal Reserve reacts to the situation, the prediction of inflation over the duration of the debt and who eventually defaults.

If the Fed doesn’t react or promise help in the form of short-term loans – which is really all they can offer a state or municipality and those debts need to have a duration of six months or less and only 2% of those types of bonds do – the risk of owning the debt can rise. If inflation, which the Fed watches closely rises, the return on those yields is lessened. If defaults become likely over a sector fo the bond market and the Fed does nothing and inflation rises, the issuer is unable to create new debt to pay old by rolling it over and is forced to simply default on the debt, leaving the bondholders to pick through the remains of what is owed.

Told you it wouldn’t be simple. And 2011 looks to be even more complicated. Debt is usually issued by three different entities: the Treasury, corporations and local states and municipalities. The Treasury sells bonds or debt to primary dealers. Then, the Fed turns around and prints money to buy that debt from those primary dealers leaving them with a nice margin for the effort. This roundabout financing is not much more than a shuffle of numbers and in the end, everyone is happy. Why? Because banks cannot run out of money so the cycle feeds on itself.

Some say that this is aberration of market discipline, a longstanding belief that prices for products set themselves. When the Fed intervenes with freshly printed dollars, buying assets that may or may not be worth the price paid – and lately its been the later – the illusion that everything is okay even as those purchases are held or otherwise resold for pennies on the dollar, can in some expert’s opinion do more harm than good.

To give you some idea what the Fed is actually capable of there is a mission statement written by the Federal Reserve System under the heading  ”Purposes and Functions” which defines its duties as falling into four basic categories: “conducting the nation’s monetary policy by influencing the monetary and credit conditions in the economy in pursuit of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates; supervising and regulating banking institutions to ensure the safety and soundness of the nation’s banking and financial system and to protect the credit rights of consumers; maintaining the stability of the financial system and containing systemic risk that may arise in financial markets; providing financial services to depository institutions, the U.S. government, and foreign official institutions, including playing a major role in operating the nation’s payments system”

In part of one of our two part series (the next will be on corporate debt) the interaction between the federal government’s ability to help the states and municipalities deal with what is surfacing as the next debt bubble for the economy is a very real concern among investors who pay attention to these events. You probably haven’t given this much consideration considering the vast majority of investors who own these types of bonds do so with them safely tucked inside their target date funds. Some have straightforward bond funds.

Should you worry about these investments? Yes and no. I don’t think that despite the problems that states and municipalities are having with their debt, Ben Bernanke is going to allow for any sort of mass default. Instead of coming right out and purchasing these trouble debt instruments, which only Congress can authorize and is not likely to do, he will use the backdoor approach of Printing money to buy these assets from Wall Street. The local governments get to stay solvent, the banks make money on the transfer and the debt is eventually offloaded with only pennies on the dollar spent for the effort. And yes, because if that doesn’t happen, the losses could mount up quickly and viciously.

Conservative investments are not what they used to be – but then little is. The illusion of safety in fixed income might come back to bite more investors this year than many of us would anticipate. And those with maturing target date funds will feel the brunt of those problems twice: first in lost returns in their funds and second in the increased taxes they will pay in the places they live. (Best suggestion: push the target date back a couple of decades to take advantage of a robust stock market and lower exposure to fixed income investments in those funds.)

As I mentioned earlier, we’ll talk about corporate bonds next and the odd relationship they have with the stock market.